Nemo Me Impune Lacessit

Monday, 4 January 2016

A Response to the Socialist Just-Us Worriers

Filed under: Principles, Resistance — Tags: , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 12:40 AM (00:40)

“We are fighting to end hate, to unite as one and love each other. We are fighting to be treated right without discrimination and for everyone to have equal opportunities.”

Bullshit. You have no quantifiable metrics for injustice, so you have no victory conditions (for a very simplified example, when blacks hold X% of all engineering jobs and are only Y% of all prisoners, racism is ended). That would be fine by itself, but you believe in fighting injustice with injustice (gays have historically been denied gay marriage? let’s get random CEOs fired for opinions they held six years ago). You don’t seek converts, you seek to punish and bully — straight white males who disagree with you must be purged and publicly humiliated. Even the jihadists will spare you if you convert; no apology or future correction will satisfy a SJW.

I could forgive that too if you weren’t all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissenters is appalling; if they don’t want you acting on their behalf, that’s their choice, not “internalized patriarchy” or whatever. You rob them of moral agency. When called out for these behaviors (as you always insist on calling out others), you lie. You strawman your opponents (criticized a woman? misogynist!), you group them with the worst (you’re a gamer? you’re as bad as the anonymous rape threateners!) and when confronted with your own flaws, you restate them less threateningly (motte and bailey argument). You phrase all arguments as kafkatraps (disagreeing with your assertion that we are evil is taken as proof that we’re evil). You publish manipulated and misleading statistics, then lambast anyone who questions them.

You insist on vigilante justice against random acts of the week for your two-minutes hate. Why is it the NFL’s business to punish domestic violence? And, if it is their business, why isn’t Hope Solo receiving the same attention from your side?

Then you claim to be arguing for equality, but you’ve taken the idea of racism (hatred based on skin color is bad) and replaced it with a new concept where only one race can be guilty of racism. You excuse racial prejudice and hatred based on what I’ve already explained are arbitrary, unmeasured states of being. Your solution for the unequal treatment of whites and blacks is to hold whites to a higher standard. Your side lobbied the FBI to redefine rape so more women victims would be counted, but also so that “made to penetrate” does not count, leaving male victims in the cold. Because male privilege, apparently.

Historically ignorant SJWs think whites hold collective guilt for the awful things our ancestors have done. But they don’t care about the unspeakable atrocities by other races. The only difference between whites and others was that whites had the social and technological prowess to do evil efficiently; Africans, Asians, Indians, and everyone else practiced genocide and slavery, they were just less adept at doing it right. Given the means, they would have done the same. But nope, only whites are guilty; Arab oppression of blacks and caucasians never happened, not to us, nope.

I’ve been lucky enough to grow up in America, so this shit is new to me. But I’m descended from puritans, and I know my history; I know how they treated dissent. I also know how commies treated dissent; I grew up next door to a grizzled old Russian who barely avoided the gulag by smuggling himself out of the country. I know what you petty tyrants have turned into every time you gained enough power.

Worst of all, you turn the very principles of freedom against us. We tolerate you because we believe in free speech and civil discourse, not bullying and violence. But that means we have to watch you advocate against that very freedom. We don’t believe in ruining a stranger’s professional life over an opinion, but that means that we can’t punish your actions.

We believe that the rightness of our actions should speak for itself. You believe in bullying, even as you claim to love the oppressed.

Funny how the evil and all-powerful patriarchy has seen fit to act according to SJW whims for all of recent memory, punishing those they hate and protecting those they love. Funny how the evil oppressor males have to speak anonymously, while the SJWs fighting the power can use their real names and get mainstream media coverage for fun and profit. How when a million straight white male nerds get bullied, no one cares, but the minute one fag hangs himself, suddenly bullying matters — and the solution, of course, is more bullying, but by the “right” people.

That’s the arrogant core of it. You do the same evil, in the same pattern, as so many before you, because mob justice, punishing dissent, and repression of others is just fine and dandy so long as the “right” people are doing it to the “wrong” people.

Eat shit and die. All I ever asked was to be left alone.

No, I didn’t write it.

However, I agree one hundred percent, so I’m reposting it here.

Also, I’ve previously been slandered or libeled as being a racist (I’ll admit I’ve considered litigation). Racism sucks. So does being falsely accused of being a racist.

Finally, for those wondering why I refer to these pukes as “Socialist Just-Us Worriers” instead of the “conventional” moniker of “social justice warriors,” from what I’ve seen from them —

  1. “Socialist” — Have you ever heard any of them stick up for individual liberty, or the laissez-nous-faire free market? Neither have I.
  2. “Just-us” — Actual justice isn’t on the agenda. What is on the agenda is making the world and everyone in it inoffensive to them and theirs.
  3. “Worriers” — Trying to picture these people as ANY sort of actual combatant as is usually meant by the word “warrior” makes my head hurt.

H/T Milo Yiannopoulos


NOTES

  1. Approximate reading level – 11.9
  2. Reposted –
    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs – App.net / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook page / Facebook profile / Google Plus / seen.life / tsu / Twitter / WordPress.com

Copyright © 2016 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with medit.

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Coverup in the Bernalillo County GOP [1]

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 2:24 AM (02:24)

Over the past ten days the Republican Delegates to the State Pre-Primary Convention have been flooded with stories and rumors of what took place at the Bernalillo Pre-Convention Meeting on February 5th, 2014.

In order for our party to be unified in defeating Tom Udall, we are releasing all documents pertaining to the events of February 5th, with an understanding of how those events took place and how people have been pressured to change their stories to benefit the Weh campaign.

We hope that after reading these materials you will come to your own conclusion as to whether any wrongdoing occurred at the Bernalillo Pre-Convention Meeting, or the events that transpired following that night.

What Occurred On February 5th?

Three days prior to the Pre-Convention Meeting, the Bernalillo rules committee met and changed the county rules to allow “those that could not attend the convention due to weather be allowed to be voted upon as a delegate by those attending the event.”

New Mexico State Rules, which supersede any county rules declare that any rule change must occur at least 28 days prior to any county convention, and the Clements campaign was notified of this change only an hour prior to the start of the convention. (1) (2) (3)

Any challenge to this ruling was required to be made no later than one hour before the start of any county convention, which happens to be the exact time that the Clements campaign was informed of the rule change.(4)

The second, and more egregious, error made by the county committee involves the election of at large delegates.

After delegates were nominated and elected by each ward of Bernalillo county, 30 delegate positions were still available to be elected to the state convention. Past convention precedent clearly shows that these “at-large” delegates are to be elected from the pool of unelected delegate nominees remaining in person at the county convention. Instead, they were elected from a list of non-present persons provided to the meeting by Diego Espinoza, Allen Weh’s own campaign manager. (4)

Throughout this process the ballots were “secured” by none other than the treasurer for Allen Weh’s campaign, and “ballot counters” were actually Allen Weh staff members who were even wearing campaign materials. (5) (6)

What Was Done To Correct Any Wrongdoing?

By the deadline to contest the decision, February 10th, multiple protests were submitted to the chairman of the Bernalillo County Republican Party, Frank Ruvolo. (7) (21)

A decision on the issue was returned later on February, 10th. He had decided that the at-large delegates were improperly placed and would be removed from the Bernalillo slate. (8)

This decision was aided with input from Dr. Charles Tipton, and input from State Republican Chairman John Billingsley. (9) (10)

The matter seemed to be put to rest until Chairman Ruvolo suddenly reversed his decision citing “long discussions” and reseating the at-large delegates. (11)

How the Clements Campaign Responded

On February 17th, David Clements released an open letter to Allen Weh informing him of what had occurred, and sought the opportunity to work together to find an equitable solution to what happened in Bernalillo County. (12)

Later on February 17th Diego Espinoza responded to David Clements claiming that no protests had been filed and that David’s letter was a stunt. David Clements quickly responded. (12)

After this email was sent, emails were circulate from Frank Ruvolo, Dr. Charles Tipton, and Chairman John Billingsley seemingly denying that they had ever provided testimony or decisions that would call into question the events of February 5th. (13) (14)

Chairman Billingsley even emailed every delegate in response to Clements’ open letter. (15) (16)

What Happened Next?

The latest in this series of events occurred on February 21st, when the Clements campaign email account was hacked by a staff member of the Allen Weh Campaign.

Diego Espinoza, the Weh campaign manager, abused the Clements email system and used it to resend the open letter to multiple delegates. (17)

Mr. Espinoza willingly did this numerous times, and some delegates received over 8 copies of the open letter to Allen Weh.

The Clements campaign went to their Internet service provider to find out why delegates were receiving multiple copies of the open letter. They were provided with a link that identified Mr. Espinoza as having willingly forwarded the email in excess of 500 times. (18) (19) (20)

There is no question that Diego Espinoza acted with ill intent in regards to David’s open letter to Allen Weh.

SOURCE DOCUMENTATION

We encourage you to read these documents, examine them, and make a decision on what you believe happened.

Please Note: Email addresses, phone numbers, MAC addresses, IP addresses and other information are redacted for privacy.

  1. “Republican Party of Bernalillo County Prescribed Special Rules of 2012 Pre-Primary Convention And Mass Meeting of Ward Caucuses;” February 19th, 2012
  2. “Republican Party of Bernalillo County Prescribed Special Rules of 2014 Pre-Primary Convention And Mass Meeting of Ward Caucuses;” February 5th, 2014
  3. “Supplementary County Rules of the Republican Party of Bernalillo County, New Mexico;” January 15, 2001
  4. “Clements Campaign Protest for Wards 10 through 31;” Filed by Bernalillo SCC official Mike Nagel February 7th, 2013
  5. Image 1: “Allen Weh Treasurer, Rebecca Sanchez, in charge of securing ballots;” February 5th, 2014
  6. Image 2: “Allen Weh staffer in charge of counting cast ballots;” February 5th, 2014
  7. Email A: From: mnagel65@, To: dkclements@, Subject: “RE: Press Release,” Sent: Thursday, February 13th, 2014 2:37 PM MST
  8. Email B: From: chairman@, To: Clements & Weh Campaigns, Subject: “Bernalillo County Convention,” Sent: Monday, Feb. 10th, 2014 7:51 PM MST
  9. Email C: From: dkclements@, To: mnagel65@, Subject: “Press Release,” Sent: Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 8:55 PM MST
  10. Email Conversation A: dkclements@; mnagel65@; chatipton@, Subject: “What I saw,” Sent: Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 9:11 PM MST – Thursday, February 13th, 2014 12:21 PM MST
  11. Email Conversation B: dkclements@; fruvolo752@, Subject: “Bernalillo County,” Sent: Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 8:49 AM MST – Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 11:57 AM MST
  12. Email Conversation C: diego@; dkclements;@; pxsandman@; bobm1244@; kabatson@; noralee@, Subject: “Re: Fraudulent Convention Delegates – a must read,” Sent: Monday, February 17th, 2014 1:30 PM MST – Monday, February 17th, 2014 11:36 PM MST
  13. Email Conversation D: dkclements@; diego@; chatipton@, Subject: “Re: Fraudulent Convention Delegates – a must read,” Sent: Monday, February 17th, 2014 11:36 PM MST – Tuesday, February 18th, 2014 1:31 AM MST
  14. Email D: fruvolo@ to Clements & Weh Campaigns, Subject: “Bernalillo County,” Sent: Wednesday, February 19th, 2014 9:11 PM MST
  15. Email E: communications@ to Statewide Delegates, Subject: “Proper Procedure for Contesting Delegates,” Sent: Tuesday, February 18th, 2014 4:14 PM MST
  16. Email F: dkclements@ to john.pb45@, Subject: “Did not receive a formal complaint?,” Sent: Wednesday, February 19th 2014 2:30 PM MST
  17. Reference of all relevant documents and information to the New Mexico State Police, Special Investigations Division, as necessary and appropriate in cooperation with a criminal investigation is intended.
  18. Image 3: “Diego forwarding emails from his campaign account;” February 25th, 2014
  19. Image 4: “Linking Diego to his campaign account;” February 25th, 2014
  20. Image 5: “Email Provider Diagnostic;” February 25th, 2014
  21. Email G: From: mm@, To: dklclements@, Subject: “Open Letter to Frank Ruvolo,” Sent: February 26th, 2014 7:55 AM MST

FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

  1. Santa Fe Reporter: US Senate Candidate Alleges Email Hacking, Delegate Cheating In Contentious GOP Primary
  2. Google search – Clements Weh

NOTES

  1. Approximate reading level – 14.1
  2. Original articles
  3. Reposted –
    1. The Weekly SeditionFacebook / Google Plus / Twitter / WordPress

Copyright © 2014 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepad++.

bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Wednesday, 11 August 2010

Couldn’t think this one up for the life of me . . .

Filed under: Humor, Viewing — Tags: , , , — mikewb1971 @ 12:48 PM (12:48)

Current mood: amused



Thanks to Mark Quon for posting this one on his Facebook Wall


bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Thursday, 25 December 2008

Border Patrol Video

Filed under: Politics, Viewing — Tags: , , , — mikewb1971 @ 11:50 PM (23:50)

Current mood: amused

Monday, 15 December 2008

With friends like these

Filed under: Life, Networking, Politics — Tags: , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 10:38 PM (22:38)

I received this one after I posted the blog entry titled “Recalling Cigarettes?”

    Subject: Truth (truth) would like to be friends with you!
    Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:11:46

    Xanga Invite

    truth wants to connect to you!
    Hi mikewb1971!
    I’m trying to add you as a friend, but I need you to add me back — you can also subscribe to my site

Seriously, I tell these people off and they send me a “friend” invite. I can’t think it up. It’s like when I created the Heil, ACORN! page on Myspace, and started getting similar invites from the various socialists and communist types from around the world. (See “ACORN’s Blood Flag“, too.)”

Thursday, 7 August 2008

America’s Borders Are NOT Open

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — mikewb1971 @ 4:41 PM (16:41)

America’s Borders Are NOT Open

by Mike Blessing [ kcufmedia@gmail.com ]

Back in April of this year, I wrote an article titled “Bring It On, Al-Qaeda!” where I suugested that we should welcome the imaginary invasion that the Busheviks say is right around the corner if the American population stops supporting their ultra-left adventurism abroad in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.

The points of the article were that if Al-Qaeda really wanted to commit more acts of terrorism against America, they would be over here doing it, and that such a campaign would be quite easily contained by Americans exercising their natural, civil, Constitutional, human right to own and carry weapons.

Anyway, a few days later (6 April), some doofus posts a comment that “WE’RE READY FOR YOU WITH OUR OPEN BORDER!!!”

If the border (I’m assuming that the poster is talking about the southern border with Mexico?) is “wide open” as suggested, then why do people coming north without permission from Washington DC have to sneak across that imaginary line in the sand? Why do they have to risk life and limb being crammed into a semi trailer with a hundred other people in 100-plus-degree heat, without water or sufficient ventilation, to cross that line if the border was “open” as suggested? Why don’t these people just walk or ride across in the open if the border is as “open” as posited by the border-closers?

The fact remains that America’s borders are NOT open as suggested – there’s whole agencies of the federal government devoted to patrolling them, i.e. the Border Patrol, U.S. Customs, among others. Governor Richardson has called for National Guard units to be posted on that same southern border.

What puzzles me about this “issue” is that people who are otherwise staunch advocates for Liberty call for the border to be sealed, physically. I’m not even sure if that’s possible. And one thing that they forget is that a government powerful enough to keep all of the lettuce pickers out is powerful enough to keep us in.


Copyright © 2008 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepad++.

bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Thursday, 12 October 2006

‘Fraid to Fly?

Filed under: Life, Philosophy, Politics, Quizzes / Surveys, Self-Defense — Tags: , , , — mikewb1971 @ 4:58 PM (16:58)

Current mood: aggravated

> since i am a pilot i have a question ………….who is afraid to fly …..and why ?
> if you do not fly …….what method do you use trains .bus ……or your personal auto?

I’m not afraid to fly. I rather like it, in fact. It’s quick and fun.

HOWEVER . . .

I am averse to what’s available these days for “commercial aviation” :

From the Wiktionary entry on “averse”:

1.1 Adjective –
1. Turned away or backward.
2. Having a repugnance or opposition of mind; disliking; disinclined; unwilling; reluctant.

No.2 is the operative definition here. I find the common practices of commercial airline companies repugnant and so I am disinclined to use their services. Those practices include:

Overbooking

Breaking up parties – I’ve always ended up with total strangers who couldn’t SHUT THE FUCK UP to save their own lives.

The shitty selection of music available on the earphones they provide.

The way they let people bring way more than the limit on board — then those people insist on using YOUR overhead compartment.

The ever-worsening searches that did NOT stop the al-Qaeda terrorists on 11 Sept 2001.

I will fly with the first airline that allows me to board the plane with one of my Glock pistols worn openly visible on my belt. I have no problem with the ticket-counter people insisting that I use Mag-Safe or Glaser ammo – it is their plane, after all.


NOTES

  1. Reposted –
    1. Personal blogs – Myspace / Xanga

Copyright © 2006 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepad++.

bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: