Nemo Me Impune Lacessit

Tuesday, 22 September 2020

[Letter to ABQ City Council] Please OPPOSE O-19-82 AND O-19-83

Filed under: Politics, Resistance, Self-Defense — Tags: , , , , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 12:28 AM (00:28)

From: Mike Blessing
To: Councilor Lan Sena <>, Councilor Isaac Benton <>, Councilor Klarissa Peña <>, Councilor Brook Bassan <>, Councilor Cynthia Borrego <>, Councilor Pat Davis <>, Councilor Diane Gibson <>, Councilor Trudy Jones <>, Councilor Don Harris <>
CC: Policy Analyst Diane Dolan <>, Policy Analyst Rachael Hernandez <>, Policy Analyst Susan Vigil <>, Policy Analyst Sean Foran <>, Policy Analyst Abigail Stiles <>, Policy Analyst Aziza Chavez <>, Policy Analyst Laura Rummler <>
Date: September 21, 2020, 11:42 AM MST
Subject: Please OPPOSE O-19-82 AND O-19-83

Dear Councilors:

I am writing to you in order to speak up against two pieces of proposed legislation scheduled to come before the Council today, O-19-82 and O-19-83.

Ordinance O-19-82 will attempt to mandate secure storage of firearms.

Ordinance O-19-83 seeks to create a city ordinance out of Keller’s questionable order banning firearms on city owned or leased properties.

Both ordinances would violate the Constitution of the State of New Mexico, Article II, Section 6, which states:

No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.

A recent attempt to pass a non-binding resolution to repeal this seciton of the state Constitution failed in the council 5-4.

Let’s make no mistake about it these proposed ordinances are in no way, shape or form about “gun safety” or “gun control”.

True gun safety and gun control stem from the four safety rules, the seven fundamentals of marksmanship, and knowing what is and is not a legitimate target.

If the people backing “Everytown for Gun Safety” truly care about firearms safety, then why aren’t they chipping in towards firearms safety training, as does the group they list as their archnemesis, the National Rifle Association?

If Michael Bloomberg and the other multi-millionaires behind “Everytown for Gun Safety” truly cared about gun safety, they would put their millions behind the construction of MORE shooting ranges, and the maintenance of existing ones. They would chip in for the creation of DVDs and online video shows that provide instruction on the safe and proficient handling of firearms.

Instead, all they do is lobby and agitate for more restrictive laws upon the pre-existing civil, Constitutional, human individual right to own and carry weapons, as supposed to be guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and Article II, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of New Mexico.

Rather, the legislation in question (O-19-82 and O-19-83) is more properly called “victim disarmament,” in that the people most likely to be affected by it are the people who have the most reason to own and carry firearms for self-defense — the little old lady or the paraplegic who lives alone in a bad neighborhood, the five-foot-nothing 100-pound woman being stalked by a six-foot 200-pound deranged ex-boyfriend.

The bad people (the criminals, terrorists, and violence-inclined mental defectives) whom the proponents of this legislation say will be disarmed by it most likely will not be affected in the least. If they want access to a firearm, they will have it, by hook or by crook.

You see, the bad guys have found this massive loophole in the existing restrictions on private civilians’ rights to own and carry weapons called “breaking the law.”

There are already 20,000 to 25,000 existing restrictions upon the pre-existing individual, civil, Constitutional, human right to own and carry weapons, which are supposed to be guaranteed against State infringement by the Second Amendment and Article 2, Section 6 of the State Constitution. None of these anti-liberty statutes has stopped a bad guy from obtaining a firearm when they want it.

Laws already exist that prohibit felons, domestic abusers, foreign terrorists, incurable drug abusers and alcoholics, and mental defectives from obtaining, owning or carrying firearms.

Laws already exist that prohibit the use of firearms (and other objects) to harm other people (murder, assault with a deadly weapon, etc.).

I think it’s safe to say that all these laws have done is keep honest people honest, the same way locks on doors do.

Those who propose further infringements upon individual liberty aren’t truly looking to improve the human condition at all, but seeking more power over others for whatever reasons. No good will come from these infringements — no good has ever come from these sorts of laws, and no good ever will.

As for the phrase “gun violence” —

Why are not criminal stabbings or slashings with knives ever referred to as “knife violence” ?

Why are hit and run murders done with cars or trucks never called “automotive violence” ?

Why are attacks using baseball bats, pry bars, hammers and pieces of steel rebar never referred to as “blunt object violence” ?

Look, no one is trying to take your government away. We just want to have an honest, open, adult conversation about common-sense restrictions on government. If we can save just one child from government violence, it will be worth it.

Mike Blessing

Who owns you? Who runs your life? Who should — you or someone else?
Freedom is the answer — what’s the question?


From: Bassan, Brook <>
To: Mike Blessing
Date: September 21, 2020, 11:48 AM MST
Subject: Re: Please OPPOSE O-19-82 AND O-19-83

Good morning,

I agree with your statements. I do not believe we should impose more regulations especially at a municipal level and when they appear to work in opposition of the United States Constitution while possibly putting more innocent people at risk. I do not plan on supporting these Ordinances.

Thank you for reaching out.

Brook Bassan
Albuquerque City Councilor
District 4
Office: 505-768-3101
Fax: 505-768-3227

From: Jones, Trudy <>
To: Mike Blessing
Date: September 21, 2020, 11:56 AM MST
Subject: Re: Please OPPOSE O-19-82 AND O-19-83

Thank you for your comments. I do not support this legislation.

Trudy E. Jones


  1. Reposted —
    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs — Diaspora* / Facebook page / Flote / Gab / Spreely page / Twitter / VK / Wimkin page
    2. The Weekly SeditionFacebook page / Spreely page / Twitter / WordPress

Copyright © 2020 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepadqq and Notepad++.

Monday, 30 March 2020

DingleBerry Express Shuts Down!

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 2:24 AM (02:24)

Recently, KOB News reported that the DingleBerry Express[1] has shut down, at least temporarily, due to COVID-19 hysteria —

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.- The City of Albuquerque continues to adjust services to help prevent the spread of COVID-19.

“It’s very serious and important that we all as a community work on some of this,” Mayor Tim Keller said

Public transportation will begin operating on a Saturday schedule, starting March 28.

The mayor also announced Albuquerque Rapid Transit (ART) service would be suspended on March 28.

“The ART route, that whole thing will stop this weekend,” Mayor Keller said.

Never mind that the DingleBerry Express (some call it “Albuquerque Rapid Transit” or “ART”) isn’t anything more than an overpriced remaking of the Central Avenue “Rapid Ride.”

If you look at video clips and photographs of the DingleBerry Express busses, you can see “766 RED LINE” and “777 GREEN LINE” on the top of the buses’ front ends. Just like on the “Rapid Ride” that preceded the DingleBerry Express.

In fact, the “Rapid Ride” “Blue Line” (Route 790) still exists, and still uses the same sort of buses that the “Red Line” and “Green Line” used before the DingleBerry Express was created.

The best case that we can expect from this is that the ad hoc demolition derby along Central Ave will be put on something resembling a hiatus until at least Easter weekend (Friday, 10 April 2020), as that’s when the Governor’s “shelter in place” order is supposed to expire.

“The local 66 route will continue. That’s a part of the Saturday operating schedule.”

So Albuquerque’s Number One rolling bad neighborhood and disease vector continues its operation. Just wonderful.

As for city parks, Mayor Keller said they will be open but playgrounds will be off limits.

“The state is asking people not to go to parks, there is an exception I believe for exercise,” Keller said. “We are officially closing all our playgrounds.”

The mayor said the Albuquerque Police Department can enforce the governor’s stay-at-home order.

That last line there is what separates Albuquerque’s First Crook Tim Keller from his freelance comrades.

Mind you, this schtick of Keller and Lujan-Grisham isn’t new in any sense. It’s the same attitude displayed by French King Louis XIV when he said “L’etat, c’est moi” [“I am The State,” in other words, “My every utterance is law.”] and had the phrase Ultima Ratio Regum [“the final argument of kings”] cast onto the barrels of the cannon fielded by the Armée royale française — “Do what I tell you, or my guys will point this cannon at your home and light it off.”


  1. DingleBerry Express — Facebook page, Spreely page


  1. Reposted –
    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs – Blogspot / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook [page, profile] / Flote / Friendica / Gab / / Minds / Spreely [page, profile] / Twitter / VK
    2. Absurdist Discordian Party of New Mexico — Facebook page, Spreely page
    3. All Aboard the DingleBerry Express — Facebook page, Spreely page
    4. Discordian Absurdist Party of New Mexico — Facebook page, Spreely page
    5. KCUF Media Facebook page
    6. New Mexico Dissent and Expose Facebook page
    7. New Mexico Libertarians — Facebook group, Facebook page, Spreely group, Spreely page
    8. Resist Marxism Facebook page
    9. Vote Dumpster Fire Facebook page
    10. The Weekly SeditionFacebook / Spreely / Twitter / WordPress

Monday, 10 February 2014

A “Brewery District” for Albuquerque?

Filed under: Economics, Politics — Tags: , , , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 9:51 PM (21:51)

Recently, State Senator (and Majority Leader) Tim Keller sponsored a Senate “Memorial” (SM81) that a “brewery district” should be created in Albuquerque.

The Legislature’s page for SM81

Here’s the actual text of SM81.

Here’s the KOB puff piece on this – Lawmakers call for brewery district in Albuquerque

How is a “memorial” (basically a non-binding resolution) going to do anything besides give Keller & Co. some press coverage about how they’re “pro-business” ?

What are Keller & Co. going to do to reduce the regulatory burden upon new and existing businesses?

What exactly are Keller & Co. proposing to REPEAL in this session?


  1. Approximate reading level – 12.7
  2. Reposted –
    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs – Facebook / Google Plus / Twitter / Yahoo!
    2. Libertarian Party –
      1. LPNM – Blog / Facebook page / Twitter page / Facebook group / Yahoo! group
      2. LPBCNM – Blog / Facebook page / Facebook group
      3. New Mexico Libertarians Facebook group
    3. The Weekly SeditionFacebook / Google Plus / Twitter / WordPress / Yahoo!
  3. Current mood: cranky, pessimistic
  4. Listening – Gambling with the Devil by Helloween

Copyright © 2014 Libertarian Party of New Mexico, Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County, New Mexico and Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with Notepad++.

bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: