Nemo Me Impune Lacessit

Monday, 4 January 2016

A Response to the Socialist Just-Us Worriers

Filed under: Principles, Resistance — Tags: , , , , — mikewb1971 @ 12:40 AM (00:40)

“We are fighting to end hate, to unite as one and love each other. We are fighting to be treated right without discrimination and for everyone to have equal opportunities.”

Bullshit. You have no quantifiable metrics for injustice, so you have no victory conditions (for a very simplified example, when blacks hold X% of all engineering jobs and are only Y% of all prisoners, racism is ended). That would be fine by itself, but you believe in fighting injustice with injustice (gays have historically been denied gay marriage? let’s get random CEOs fired for opinions they held six years ago). You don’t seek converts, you seek to punish and bully — straight white males who disagree with you must be purged and publicly humiliated. Even the jihadists will spare you if you convert; no apology or future correction will satisfy a SJW.

I could forgive that too if you weren’t all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissenters is appalling; if they don’t want you acting on their behalf, that’s their choice, not “internalized patriarchy” or whatever. You rob them of moral agency. When called out for these behaviors (as you always insist on calling out others), you lie. You strawman your opponents (criticized a woman? misogynist!), you group them with the worst (you’re a gamer? you’re as bad as the anonymous rape threateners!) and when confronted with your own flaws, you restate them less threateningly (motte and bailey argument). You phrase all arguments as kafkatraps (disagreeing with your assertion that we are evil is taken as proof that we’re evil). You publish manipulated and misleading statistics, then lambast anyone who questions them.

You insist on vigilante justice against random acts of the week for your two-minutes hate. Why is it the NFL’s business to punish domestic violence? And, if it is their business, why isn’t Hope Solo receiving the same attention from your side?

Then you claim to be arguing for equality, but you’ve taken the idea of racism (hatred based on skin color is bad) and replaced it with a new concept where only one race can be guilty of racism. You excuse racial prejudice and hatred based on what I’ve already explained are arbitrary, unmeasured states of being. Your solution for the unequal treatment of whites and blacks is to hold whites to a higher standard. Your side lobbied the FBI to redefine rape so more women victims would be counted, but also so that “made to penetrate” does not count, leaving male victims in the cold. Because male privilege, apparently.

Historically ignorant SJWs think whites hold collective guilt for the awful things our ancestors have done. But they don’t care about the unspeakable atrocities by other races. The only difference between whites and others was that whites had the social and technological prowess to do evil efficiently; Africans, Asians, Indians, and everyone else practiced genocide and slavery, they were just less adept at doing it right. Given the means, they would have done the same. But nope, only whites are guilty; Arab oppression of blacks and caucasians never happened, not to us, nope.

I’ve been lucky enough to grow up in America, so this shit is new to me. But I’m descended from puritans, and I know my history; I know how they treated dissent. I also know how commies treated dissent; I grew up next door to a grizzled old Russian who barely avoided the gulag by smuggling himself out of the country. I know what you petty tyrants have turned into every time you gained enough power.

Worst of all, you turn the very principles of freedom against us. We tolerate you because we believe in free speech and civil discourse, not bullying and violence. But that means we have to watch you advocate against that very freedom. We don’t believe in ruining a stranger’s professional life over an opinion, but that means that we can’t punish your actions.

We believe that the rightness of our actions should speak for itself. You believe in bullying, even as you claim to love the oppressed.

Funny how the evil and all-powerful patriarchy has seen fit to act according to SJW whims for all of recent memory, punishing those they hate and protecting those they love. Funny how the evil oppressor males have to speak anonymously, while the SJWs fighting the power can use their real names and get mainstream media coverage for fun and profit. How when a million straight white male nerds get bullied, no one cares, but the minute one fag hangs himself, suddenly bullying matters — and the solution, of course, is more bullying, but by the “right” people.

That’s the arrogant core of it. You do the same evil, in the same pattern, as so many before you, because mob justice, punishing dissent, and repression of others is just fine and dandy so long as the “right” people are doing it to the “wrong” people.

Eat shit and die. All I ever asked was to be left alone.

No, I didn’t write it.

However, I agree one hundred percent, so I’m reposting it here.

Also, I’ve previously been slandered or libeled as being a racist (I’ll admit I’ve considered litigation). Racism sucks. So does being falsely accused of being a racist.

Finally, for those wondering why I refer to these pukes as “Socialist Just-Us Worriers” instead of the “conventional” moniker of “social justice warriors,” from what I’ve seen from them —

  1. “Socialist” — Have you ever heard any of them stick up for individual liberty, or the laissez-nous-faire free market? Neither have I.
  2. “Just-us” — Actual justice isn’t on the agenda. What is on the agenda is making the world and everyone in it inoffensive to them and theirs.
  3. “Worriers” — Trying to picture these people as ANY sort of actual combatant as is usually meant by the word “warrior” makes my head hurt.

H/T Milo Yiannopoulos


  1. Approximate reading level – 11.9
  2. Reposted –
    1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs – / Diaspora* / Ello / Facebook page / Facebook profile / Google Plus / / tsu / Twitter /

Copyright © 2016 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with medit.

Random Shots for Sunday, 3 January 2016

Filed under: Random Shots — mikewb1971 @ 12:20 AM (00:20)

Today in history

Comments I’ve posted

  1. Posted to Facebook

    I ran into John Trochmann at the Preparedness Expo in Denver in November, 1996. He kept pitching the MoM books and videos to me — it took me three, four times of telling him “Sorry, not right now” before he got the message that I wasn’t going to max out my credits cards for him.

  2. Posted to Facebook

    What ever happened to the “dissent is patriotic” line I kept hearing from Democrats during the Bush years?

  3. Posted to Facebook

    I just skimmed through my paper copy of today’s Albuquerque Journal again — no mention AT ALL of this. Very curious.

    For what it’s worth, several members of the NM Militia v.1995 talked at times back then about going to other states for stuff like this, or calling for similar out-of-state groups to assist if we were ever surrounded.

  4. Posted to Facebook

    I told XXX XXXXXX and the others back then that if I was surrounded like Koresh & Co, at Waco were, I wouldn’t call for groups from across the country to try to break me out. Instead, I’d want them to start some stuff in their own areas — where they know the ground better, their supply chains wouldn’t be as long, etc. Plus, I remember reading that the feds would be hard-pressed to handle *two* (or more) simultaneous situations / incidents like this.

    Lots of talk back then about “making our stand” in the same way as the Alamo.

    And if MoM were to show up, first thing John Trochmann would do (in my opinion) would be to inquire if he could get a phone line for his Square processing gear, so he could start selling books.

  5. Posted to Facebook

    For what it’s worth, I’ve seen comments on FB saying that the Hammonds were convicted of arson for conducting some sort of controlled burn, and this is common practice for ranchers. Any truth to that (ranchers doing controlled burns) ?

  6. Posted to Facebook

    MoM = Militia of Montana

  7. Posted to Facebook

    To be fair, it’s not just the feds. There are plenty at the state and local level who get their kicks out of pushing others around. The cancer has metastasized (sp?).

  8. Posted to Facebook

    I’d find it difficult to answer that question with an unequivocal “yes.”

  9. Posted to Facebook

    I’m with Lynn here. How many battles have been lost by overestimating the opposition?

  10. Posted to Facebook

  11. Posted to Facebook

    Well, then, the Home Office simply must collect them up and toss them into the North Sea. Can’t take a chance that any bloody commoners might get their hands on them, right-o, chaps?

  12. Posted to Facebook

Listening / Reading / Watching

  1. AllOutdoorMichigan School District Plans “Lockdown” on Open Carry Parents by Rob Reed [H/T Michael Z. Williamson]
  2. Sipsey Street Irregulars by Mike Vanderboegh — Perfect timing for the regime. Federal provocateurs, sociopaths and idiots with a John Brown complex are writing checks that they expect the rest of us to cash in our blood. [H/T Oleg Volk]
  3. The Federalist [Papers] ProjectHere Are The Top 10 Republican Betrayals of 2015 [LIST] by Russ Helper [H/T Wendy Irby]
  4. BreitbartRead The Epic Social Justice Warrior Smackdown That Is Going Viral by Milo Yiannopoulos [H/T “The Cynical Anarchist” Facebook page]
  5. Elite DailyHow One Generation Was Single-Handedly Able To Kill The Music Industry by Thomas Honeyman [H/T Seth Anderson Bailey]

Copyright © 2016 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
This blog entry created with medit.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: