I just thought of another way to deal with spammers.
From now on, instead of deleting their comments, I’ll simply remove their email address and website links from the comment, and change their name to “Ananymaus” (a play on “Anonymous”).
Yes, you can do that on WordPress. (I’ve just done it with three of them prior to writing this.)
Here Mitt Romney in drag New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez explains her ideals in bringing America “back” from the economic duldrums.
As with most lamestream Republicans fronted by the McCleskey Clique, there’s no real plan to bring New Mexico and America “back,” only to slow our descent into irrelevancy and servitude.
It’s a choice between going over the fiscal cliff at 100 MPH versus going over the same cliff at 150 MPH (the Democrat way).
Anyone who advocates slamming on the brakes (IMAGINE THAT!), or turning around and going away from that fiscal cliff is ridiculed as an idiot, a lunatic or labeled as “greedy” and “mean-spirited” by the Democrats and their posterior-kissers in the lamestream snoozemedia.
<sarcasm>Gee, wow, what a choice! How could I not support Republicans with everything I am, everything I have, everything I do?</sarcasm>
For example, what is she doing, as Governor of the State of New Mexico, to resist the imposition of Obamacare upon us, the private-sector citizenry?
When someone attempted to assassinate Andrew Jackson, Jackson tried to beat the crap out of the guy with his cane. I’ve heard versions that say several Senators intervened to restrain Jackson from killing the guy.
I had no idea that the furloughed federal stooges had it so rough – the horror of it all!
I mean, she gets paid to sit at home and play role-playing games over the internet, not knowing if she will be called back to approving animal-cams the next day.
This, and she could be getting paid to go to Hawai’i instead.
Considering that fifteen years ago, public schools in Boston were starting classes about the proper way to go about fisting, I’m surprised about how tame this is.
The Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. Miller said that the National Firearms Act of 1934 was constitutional because Miller’s sawed-off shotgun didn’t qualify as a “militia weapon” because it had no “military utility,” and thus wasn’t protected by the Second Amendment.
That same National Firearms Act of 1934 basically outlaws the civilian ownership of military weapons without a federal permission slip, such as machine guns (M249, M60, M240, M2, RPK, PKM), short-barreled shoulder-fired weapons (MP5, MP7, Uzi, M3, Thompson subgun, AKSU-74, PPSh) and true (select-fire) assault rifles (AK47, AK74, M16, M4, G36, AUG).
The Gun Control Act of 1968 compunded the error by adding grenade launchers (M203, M320, GP25) and large-bore anti-tank rifles (Solothurn, Lahti) to the list.
The various weapons I’ve listed above probably should be considered to have some “military utility,” considering that they were all used by various military entities around the world at some point.
Thus, the weapons I’ve listed above (and all other “military grade” weapons) should be explicitly protected by the Second Amendment.
Consider Federalist #46, where James Madison wrote that he was OK with a standing army of 25,000-30,000 men because if it got out of line and became an agent of tyranny, there were 3,000,000 civilians, similarly armed and trained, who could whoop that army.
What the Founders wanted was for the civilian population to have military parity with, if not military supremacy over the federal government.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit 